I am a firm believer that CCS is important to team/organizational effectiveness. Behind CCS is an even greater use, which involves getting a group of co-workers to bond in a cohesive group that is efficient and effective. It means to collaborate the efforts of colleagues, coordinate their efforts, and use all of the synergy created to come up with better ideas. However, I do not feel the CCS structure is not always necessary. This is because there will be times where one person may have the ability to master a specific subject pertaining to the task, and therefore be able to conduct it by their self.
There are so many options for both individual and team competencies that are necessary for successful CCS. Some of these include, but are not limited to: relationship management, role awareness, importance of knowledge, and time management. To improve, one can attempt to grow their friendship stronger with fellow employees, strive to have a better understanding of their role in the tasks, read more into their role and the overall objectives, and focus squarely and getting the items completed in a timely fashion. In our team exercise, we could have used our time more wisely, because there were times where we did not just focus on the exercise itself. Also, if we understood our strengths and weaknesses better, we could have possibly made better decisions based on what we do better within the group.
http://www.findacriminaldefenseattorney.com/Profiles/Knowles-Law-Firm-Phoenix/Articles/Collaborative-Efforts-by-Police-Bust-Shoplifting.aspx
In this Article, multiple police municipalities in Arizona used the CCS model and made a major shoplifting bust that has been occurring for several years. With the communication efforts between the cities, they were able to locate and arrest these criminals, halting an end to the shoplifting ring. Without CCS, this could possibly have not led to the same result, and these criminals may still be committing crimes.
Steven Krygowski
No comments:
Post a Comment